![]() ![]() Nelson said the semiautomatic rifle rule’s slight exceptions amount to a blanket ban for most young people, finding it is unfair for young adults to have to be police or military officers to obtain certain firearms. Nelson and Lee found Lorenz should have applied the most rigorous level of constitutional scrutiny. Circuit Judges Ryan Nelson and Kenneth Lee, both Donald Trump appointees, had ruled Lorenz should have blocked California’s ban on the sale of semiautomatic rifles to those between the ages of 18 and 21 except for some law enforcement officers and active-duty members of the military. This past May, the panel had split on the issue of whether California’s prohibition on semiautomatic rifle sales to young people unduly burdens the Second Amendment, based on U.S. Bruen, which upheld the right to bear arms as protected under the U.S. Supreme Court decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. The panel remanded the case in light of the recent U.S. In a 4-page order Wednesday, the Ninth Circuit panel vacated its opinion reversing a lower court judge’s refusal to preliminarily block a California law barring young adults from buying semiautomatic rifles, which it also vacated. ![]() Supreme Court's recent bolstering of gun rights. SAN FRANCISCO (CN) - The Ninth Circuit has sent a lawsuit challenging California’s regulation of types of firearms that can be sold to young adults back to the lower court for review in light of the U.S. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |